Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2018 20:36:41 GMT -6
A hanging "the" at the end of a line,
only to continue the
thought on the next. <--- Like that.
Stylistic choice, or an amateur mistake?
I think it can be quite effective when used in the right way, either to accentuate the fact that you're thinking while you're talking and maybe can't remember what the word is off the top of your head (1), or for some other reason you want to put some sort of pause before the next word (like example 2, where the entire poem is short and choppy to emphasize the emotions in the poem.)
But I think it's quite hard to pull off in a good way, and only really works in a few very particular instances. Aside from that, it just seems to interrupt the thought (3). It reads much more smoothly when the "the" is directly attached to the word (4), and unless your aim is to deliberately break the smoothness of the work and intentionally make it choppy and disrupted, it won't work very well. (That said, I found out that if the poem has a solid enough bounce to it like I accidentally made it have in example 3, it seems to break those rules.)
(Examples)
(1)
"Here, let me help," the bread maker said,
"You just need this pan, and the-" ...
"The bread."
(2)
I can't
believe
what you
just did
to me.
you thought
you could steal
my
heart.
(3)
I walked into the
candy shop; the
cashier said "hello." my
poem has a rhythm and
I don't know where to go.
God damn it, I don't know how to write bad examples. Oh well.
(4)
I walked into
the candy shop;
the cashier said "hello."
my poem has a rhythm
and I don't know where to go.
Interestingly enough, the rhythm works better in number three. So much for "good example, bad example."
So, thoughts on this? Ultimately, it doesn't matter much, but I guess I just find that it seems out of place sometimes as I'm reading things.
only to continue the
thought on the next. <--- Like that.
Stylistic choice, or an amateur mistake?
I think it can be quite effective when used in the right way, either to accentuate the fact that you're thinking while you're talking and maybe can't remember what the word is off the top of your head (1), or for some other reason you want to put some sort of pause before the next word (like example 2, where the entire poem is short and choppy to emphasize the emotions in the poem.)
But I think it's quite hard to pull off in a good way, and only really works in a few very particular instances. Aside from that, it just seems to interrupt the thought (3). It reads much more smoothly when the "the" is directly attached to the word (4), and unless your aim is to deliberately break the smoothness of the work and intentionally make it choppy and disrupted, it won't work very well. (That said, I found out that if the poem has a solid enough bounce to it like I accidentally made it have in example 3, it seems to break those rules.)
(Examples)
(1)
"Here, let me help," the bread maker said,
"You just need this pan, and the-" ...
"The bread."
(2)
I can't
believe
what you
just did
to me.
you thought
you could steal
my
heart.
(3)
I walked into the
candy shop; the
cashier said "hello." my
poem has a rhythm and
I don't know where to go.
(4)
I walked into
the candy shop;
the cashier said "hello."
my poem has a rhythm
and I don't know where to go.
Interestingly enough, the rhythm works better in number three. So much for "good example, bad example."
So, thoughts on this? Ultimately, it doesn't matter much, but I guess I just find that it seems out of place sometimes as I'm reading things.